Weblog
Thursday, 20 August 2009
-
A Reflection: What Have You Learned From Revelife?
I've been in a reflective mood lately, and a great deal of my reflection has been on things that have grown in importance for me this summer, one of which is blogging for Revelife. It's funny to think about it -- a blogging Web site, something you can engage in only from your computer screen, can play such a huge role in your life. But it's true -- on the main page, Revelife calls itself "Christian community for the heart, mind, and soul." And I truly think that Revelife comes as close as you can get to "community" online. As a student journalist, from the beginning, my blogging for Revelife was all about the writing. I wanted to improve my writing skills, and through my writing, share my faith with others. But the more that I wrote for Revelife, the more that I came to realize how much my posts affected others, and yes -- how others' posts have affected me. Without a doubt -- reading other people's posts on Revelife have affected me tremendously, and I've learned a lot.
The heartfelt, personal posts (which I wish would generate more comments!!) have always been favorites for me. They helped me to realize that I'm not alone in this journey of faith, and my brothers and sisters in Christ have had their ups and downs as well as they strive to grow closer to Jesus Christ.
The controversial posts (oh, how we all love controversy, as much as we might not like to admit it) have taught me a lot as well. I've learned to articulate my own viewpoints better, and I've become more opinionated! I've learned to accept viewpoints that may vastly differ from mine. I've read posts from others that I've thought -- wow, this is right on the money! I agree 100 percent.
But of course, there have been other posts that I've thought, where are these people coming from? I just can't agree with this! This has been healthy for me, though -- not harmful at all. Just because we are all Christian doesn't mean that we're bound to share the same standpoints on every single issue. That's as ludicrous as claiming that all members of your family will share the same viewpoints, or all college students will agree on everything. That's a resounding "no way!", right? Reading and responding to controversial posts has helped me to grow into the accepting kind of person that we are called to be.
Then there are the posts from non-Christians. In all honesty, I love reading those posts! I enjoy seeing how people of other faith backgrounds (or maybe no faith background) view Christianity. Although I definitely do not agree with all of the points brought up in these posts, they have definitely helped me to become more open to other ideas. A lot of these types of posts also help me to see where we have fallen short as Christians and perhaps failed to treat non-believers with the love and kindness that they, too, deserve.
It's amazing how this online blogging community has taught me so many lessons, simply from its posters and commenters alone. I'm just wondering if Revelife has done the same for you.
What have you learned from Revelife? Has anything in particular inspired you? What do you like the most/least about the site?
Friday, 14 August 2009
-
Sharing Your Testimony: Your Faith Can Transform Another's Future
I just read an article promoting a new book by the Christian author and entrepreneur Mark Steele entitled Christianish. In this book, Steele discusses his belief that Christians often put on a false front to outsiders, and fail to let others know how their relationship with Jesus Christ transformed their lives.
Steele urges that although Christ has redeemed us, we should never forget who we used to be. Sharing our stories about the sin, doubt, confusion, or disbelief that once encompassed our lives, and how Jesus "lifted us out" can be an incredibly strong model for those who do not yet know Him as their Savior.
"Christ transforms us, takes us through the rough stuff. But Christ doesn't transform us so we would bury who we used to be, hide it, and somehow put a mask on it," Steele said. "He expects us to allow others to see who we used to be and how he transformed us, so that they can believe they are transformable as well."
He adds that Christians are often too quick to hone in on their own self-righteousness and pointing out the sinful ways of others. According to Steele, Christians often fail to let others know that they are sinners too, redeemed by the blood of Jesus Christ.
"It is only in loving people to Jesus that Jesus and his power [are] able to affect them in a way that they are transformed and they are convicted of their sin and they do want to change," Steele explained. "But for some reason we feel guilty if we don't slam every detail about them that is not living perfection. We feel like we have to call that all out on the carpet before we can love someone to Jesus."
This article led me to re-examine how important it is for us as Christians to share our testimonies with others. I was never really one for sharing with others my personal story of spiritual growth. I never really even thought about my personal journey. I knew that I had come to the point of being firm in my faith, and the how didn't really matter -- to me at least.
An evangelism class I took for one semester in college called "Becoming a Contagious Christian" challenged me to think otherwise. "Maybe a non-believer has encountered similar things in life that you have," our instructor told us. "Your story could lead others to Christ."
Although I don't have the most life-altering story, a complete 360-degree turn-around moment, I've come to value my testimony more and share it more often than I ever have before. (My initial growth in my faith is best expressed in this post. Another story I like to share with others about how God has helped me through personal struggles along the way is revealed here.)
Do you agree with Steele, that we as Christians need to talk to non-believers about how we used to be and how Christ transformed us, instead of constantly honing in on the sinful ways of others? Do you often share your testimony with others, and do you think it has made an impact?
Thursday, 13 August 2009
-
Beyond the Four Walls: Church Sells Building to Focus on Service
Rev. Frank Mercer, the pastor of Rolling Hills Baptist Church in Fayetteville, Arkansas, is trying to sell his church building so that the congregation would be able to dedicate more money to working in their community, in downtown Atlanta, and in Mexico and Honduras.
The congregation is $150,000 away from paying off $1.4 million worth of land and buildings, a recent article reports.
In Fayetteville, a metropolitan area known for its megachurches and church-owned sports fields, Rolling Hills, with its 100-member congregation, stands out in that it challenges the true meaning of a church.
Mercer and his congregation willingly accept the fact that they will lose the mortgage, air-conditioning bills and insurance costs so they could devote the funds to helping the less fortunate.
Originating at a Charlotte megachurch with 20 pastors, this move is a challenging step for Mercer.
He initially intended to build Rolling Hills into a similar institution, until he visited a church in New York City that challenged him to think otherwise.
That particular church rented space, but was considering the costly option of buying a building. One of the members spoke out against the idea of buying a building.
“I’m afraid if we become a church of bricks and mortar, we’ll cease to be a church of flesh and blood," the member said.
These words inspired Dave Lebby, a Rolling Hills member, to discover "how freeing it would be” to not be confined to the church building.
Mercer completely agrees. “We spend over 50 percent of our budget on a building that we are in less than 10 percent of the time,” he said.
After returning from New York, Mercer began preaching a series explaining to his congregation that the church exists to serve others.
As a result, Rolling Hills members became more active, volunteering their time at local homeless shelters and children's homes.
After negotiating and considering the reservations some members held, the congregation arrived at a 95-to-5 decision to sell the building.
Once the building is sold, the congregation will likely rent a general-purpose building where both services and community programs will be held.
Mercer discusses his transformation through working with Rolling Hills, a church he initially intended to transform.“I came out of a megachurch in Charlotte with the idea that this church was broken and needed to be fixed,” Mercer said. “I have not saved this little church. It has saved me. I guess I am the one that needed to be fixed.”
What do you think of Rolling Hills' decision to sell their church building to dedicate more money to helping the less fortunate?
How important is the church building to you? Do you agree that "if we become a church of bricks and mortar, we’ll cease to be a church of flesh and blood?"
Tuesday, 11 August 2009
-
The Ten Stages of Faith: Do These Apply to You?
I just finished reading a post entitled "Reality Church?" that lays out the steps the average Christian undergoes when growing in their faith, becoming comfortable at their church, and getting involved in ministries there. Although I don't think the stages are 100 percent accurate, and I doubt that every Christian goes through these steps in this exact order, I think they are still worth examining. Here is the list:The First Stage: We begin going to a church, exciting, thrilling, love Jesus, the church is exciting, all things new.Second Stage: We begin getting involved, learn behind the scenes things, feel privileged to know the church staff and leaders more personally, we are totally excited.
Third Stage: We see things you start to question, the thrill of the big church meetings wanes, as it seems more and more predictable, the leaders seem more human now and not as special as first.
Fourth Stage: We start to get tired of serving in ministry. It seems routine now and we only see it as fueling the big meeting that we don't really like anymore. The leaders we once were in awe of now seem not only normal, but there is a suspicion of self-serving vs. serving the church in their motives. We lose excitement and wonder if church is even something we should be part of. We grow more disillusioned by the day.
Fifth Stage: Total disillusionment, begin feeling bitter towards church leaders, and wonder why people don’t question things more. We sit in the big meeting and feel very alone. We look at the crowds around us and don't feel like we belong anymore. Is church just a produced big meeting? We are tired and it even angers us to see excited new people joining the church as we now know how it really works and how they too will eventually become tired like we are and see church is a program and organized religion.
Sixth Stage: We silently drop out of church. We read the Bible and early church history and see that they didn't have bigger weekly meetings in the early church. We read "house church" literature and begin thinking this is the real New Testament church. We get excited about really doing church the right way and not the big organized way. We find a few other disillusioned Christians and either form or join some sort of small house church gathering. We want it to be simple and not "organized" or programmed or big, but pure like the early church. Everyone all sharing together, true community will happen here, unlike the bigger programmed meetings.
Seventh Stage: Fairly quickly, we realize it isn't too easy leading people. Even in a small house church. People don't show up, or you have people dominating conversations. There is the same bickering, some gossip, people whispering to others that they are not happy with how the meeting went etc. We sometimes try to sing worship songs with ten people and it feels very odd. So you don't try to sing anymore, but do secretly miss the corporate singing that happens in a larger group. Eventually we find the same disappointments in the smaller house church that we did in the bigger programmed church, but at a different level. We get even more disillusioned, as we realize that even the key leaders (including ourselves) and the people of the house church are just as messed up as the big church leaders and people in those churches.
We also feel subtly uncomfortable that the house church feels a bit inward focused. It would be weird to have non-Christians break up the intimate dialog and prayer we have taken such a long time to establish together. But we know something has to be done, as we keep thinking about those who don't know Jesus and that our house church might not be the best place to invite them. Plus dealing with little kids running around every week during your meeting certainly limits your full engagement into the Bible discussion. We get more disheartened as our 4 year old knocks the entire strawberry shortcake dessert onto the kitchen floor as he was trying to get at it early before it is served at the house church.
Eighth Stage: We stop going to any church of any kind. We forget it all. Watch a lot of TV. Play video games. We go see the Dukes of Hazzard movie.
Ninth Stage: We begin missing other Christians, and regular fellowship. We do some introspection and eventually deal with the disappointments and high expectations that we had. We begin a new level of maturity and thinking about the church and church leaders.
We start thinking about our options. We don't want to go to a preaching-driven church that just has everything revolve around the senior pastor or the preacher, as that subtly creates passive spectators who depend on the preacher to "feed" them weekly - rather than maturing as Christians whom should primarily be "feeding" ourselves (since we aren't infants anymore). We don't want to go to a hyper-Reformed church where we feel guilty all the time and get caught up in the everybody else is worldy and wrong but us mentality. We don't feel good about the seeker-type of churches where everyone is so happy, the music is hyper-cheery and we fill in the blanks in the notes they give out. That excites us for a little while, when we fill in the blanks, because it feels like you are really learning. But after a while we see the stack thickening in our Bibles that we stuff them in and realize that we have never even looked at them since we filled them in. We look at our notes that we filled the blanks in on, and can't remember a single thing from these sermons, even the one from two weeks ago.
Tenth Stage: So, we slowly go back to our original church that we at first felt good in because of the overall vision and mission that drew us to it in the first place. We find that the leaders do admit freely to you there are weaknesses and flaws and mess ups and ego issues, but still try their best to blend both the bigger meetings and smaller home meetings for the purpose of the mission. They try to be organized, without being "Organized".
It's not perfect, but we begin to enjoy and even more appreciate the benefits and momentum of the church. But now we get involved with more realistic expectations of what church is and understand the leaders are just like us, trying their best to serve Jesus. We become happy again with a balanced life and imperfect church family all serving on a mission together.
I certainly have not gone through all of these stages, and I'm having trouble pinpointing what stage I'm currently at. But as I read through each of the stages, I could relate to much of what the poster was discussing. It brought to mind the erratic combination of excitement and dissatisfaction that I experienced during my years singing in the music ministry at my church. (I always returned to the excitement, though.) If it's possible to be at more than one of these stages at once, that's probably where I'm at right now.
Do you think that these stages apply to your faith journey and your experience with your church? If so, what stage(s) are you at?
-
Catholic Nurse Ordered to Help With Abortion, Against Her Will
A lawsuit has been filed against Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York City for forcing a Catholic nurse who has voiced her conscientious objection to abortion to assist in the dismemberment of a child, a recent article reports.
This case is being brought before the Alliance Defense Fund, which is seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent the hospital from retaliating against the nurse, Catherina Lorena Cenzon-DeCarlo.
The injunction request lays out the details of the hospital's actions: "Because it was included in the requirements of her nursing duties as an assistant on the case, Mount Sinai forced Mrs. DeCarlo to watch the doctor remove the bloody arms and legs of the child from its mother's body by with forceps, and then after the surgery, to view the bloody body parts in the specimen cup, put saline in the cup, and take it to the specimen area."
In addition, the complaint pointed out that the abortion was not so urgent that it immediately required DeCarlo's assistance, and there was more than enough time to summon another nurse.
According the the Alliance Defense Fund, the hospital has been aware of DeCarlo's religious objections to participating in the death of a living unborn baby since 2004. Despite this, the hospital allegedly forced her to participate, threatening her with disciplinary measures should she decline. After DeCarlo refused to sign a statement confirming that she assist in future abortions, the hospital dramatically cut her on-call assignments.
ADF Legal Counsel Matt Bowman strongly argued against the actions of the hospital, labeling them as illegal and unethical."Pro-life nurses shouldn’t be forced to assist in abortions against their beliefs," Bowman said. "Requiring a devout, Catholic nurse to participate in a late-term abortion in order to remain employed is illegal, unethical, and violates her rights of conscience. Federal law requires that employers who receive funding from tax dollars must not compel employees to violate their sincerely held religious beliefs, but this nurse's objections fell on deaf ears."
The hospital allegedly set up the abortion because the mother had been diagnosed with preeclampsia, but DeCarlo knew such a condition can be treated without the necessity of an abortion.
When DeCarlo was informed that the unborn child was still alive, she immediately refused to assist. However, the nursing supervisor, Fran Carpo, did not take no for an answer.
The complaint elaborates on Carpo's demands, and even threats, forcing DiCarlo to assist in the abortion: "Ms. Carpo said that if Mrs. DeCarlo did not participate in the case, Mrs. DeCarlo would be brought up on charges of 'insubordination and patient abandonment. A charge of patient abandonment would severely jeopardize Mrs. DeCarlo's employment and her nursing license and consequently her career and her and her family's livelihood."
The request for the injunction explains that federal law doesn't condone the actions of the hospital.
"Mount Sinai is bound to respect Mrs. DeCarlo's conscience rights by virtue of several laws, but most notably 42 U.S.C. § 300a-7(c). Mount Sinai has voluntarily subjected itself to this statute by receiving hundreds of millions of federal Health and Human Services dollars in recent years," the request stated. "This statute … states in no uncertain terms that Mrs. DeCarlo is protected from discrimination by Mount Sinai in the conditions or privileges of her employment on the basis of her religious objection to assisting in abortion."
DeCarlo has faced personal trauma due to her assistance in the abortion against her will.
"She has felt intense emotional, psychological and spiritual suffering from having to participate in something she considers profoundly immoral and unjust. She has missed several days of work, has had trouble sleeping, and has had nightmares about the killing of this child. She has even had to deal with feelings of estrangement from God and family members," the law firm said.
Do you think the hospital should have forced DeCarlo to assist in the abortion, despite her conscientious objection to abortion? If you were in DeCarlo's shoes, would you have continually refused to offer assistance, despite the orders of your supervisors?


